论文部分内容阅读
在刑事诉讼法学界,被害人的精神损害赔偿权一直是争论多年的难点。反对者反对的观点之一,就是精神损害赔偿会导致对刑事被告人双重处罚。本文从双重处罚的理论本义出发,分析阐述精神损害赔偿与刑罚的并用,仅仅是一种民事与刑事责任的竞合情形,并不构成双重处罚。被害人的民事请求权不能因被害人的刑事责任而受限,精神损害赔偿有其独立的法律价值,不应受到刑事程序的排斥。
In criminal law jurisprudence, the victim’s moral right to damages has been a difficult point for many years of debate. One of the objections of opponents is that compensation for moral damages can lead to double penalties for criminal defendants. Starting from the theoretical origin of double punishment, this paper analyzes and expounds the combination of compensation for damages and punishment, which is merely a kind of cooperation between civil and criminal liability and does not constitute a double punishment. Victims of civil claims can not be limited by the victim’s criminal liability, compensation for mental damage has its own legal value, should not be excluded from criminal proceedings.