论文部分内容阅读
《最高人民法院关于公布失信被执行人名单信息的若干规定》(以下简称《若干规定》)正式施行以来,在司法实践中发挥了巨大的作用,对破解执行难,打击逃避执行的被执行人效果显著,有利于国家公民诚信体系的建设。但是该规定对于失信被执行人的标准设定过于硬性,导致司法实践中做法不统一。本文旨在从失信被执行人名单的严格限制和大胆扩张两个方面,从债权人主义和债务人主义的两种视角论证失信被执行人名单完善的多种可能性,以期对执行实践有所裨益。
Since the formal implementation of the “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court Concerning the Announcement of Information on the List of Untrusted Enforcement People” (hereinafter referred to as “the Several Provisions”), it has played a huge role in judicial practice, cracking down enforcement of enforcement and cracking down enforcement of enforced persons The effect is significant, is conducive to the construction of national citizens integrity system. However, the provision is too rigid for the standards of the executors of dishonesty, resulting in inconsistent practice in judicial practice. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the various possibilities of perfecting the list of offenders by the two perspectives of creditor and debtor from the strict restriction and bold expansion of the list of dishonest recipients so as to be beneficial to the implementation.