论文部分内容阅读
主权基金提高透明度并非道德必须,而应坚持自主性原则和联系原则。主权基金常被人拿来说事儿的第二个地方是它的透明度问题。在西方语境中,它与本专栏上次谈到的那个“是否应当和如何防范主权基金从事带有政治动机的投资活动”问题紧密相连。基于前面的论证,我认为:主权基金提高透明度并非道德必须。既然不是道德必须,那么“主权基金是否有必要搞透明,应当向谁透明,透明到什么程度,在什么条件下透明”等等问题都应该从权宜的角度来考察。
Sovereign funds to enhance transparency is not a moral necessity, but should adhere to the principle of autonomy and the principle of contact. The second area where sovereign funds are often said to be things is its transparency. In the Western context, it is closely linked to the one last mentioned in this column about whether and how to prevent sovereign funds from engaging in politically motivated investment activities. Based on the foregoing argument, I think: Sovereign funds to enhance transparency is not a moral necessity. Since it is not a moral necessity, then questions such as “Is it necessary for a sovereign fund to be transparent, to whom it should be transparent, to what extent should it be transparent, under what conditions should it be transparent?” And so on should be examined expediently.