论文部分内容阅读
虽然中国法院系统自上而下的能动司法宣传与西方语境的司法能动主义有着很大的不同,但二者在通过法律手段的灵活运用促进和维护社会发展的目标上是一致的。检察机关作为司法程序中的必要主体,也存在能动司法的空间和必要,同时这种能动司法应当遵循合法性、合理性和妥当性的运行规则。附条件逮捕制度的发端和运行就是检察机关运用能动司法理念适时而为的一个例证。
Although there is a great difference between top-down and active judicial advocacy in China’s court system and the judicial activism in western context, both of them are consistent in promoting and safeguarding social development through the flexible application of legal means. As the necessary subject of the judicial procedure, procuratorial organs also have the space and necessity of active judicial work. At the same time, such active judiciary should follow the operating rules of legitimacy, rationality and validity. The onset and operation of the conditional arrest system is an example of the timely application of an active judicial concept by prosecutors.