论文部分内容阅读
引证150余年前拉马克的动物哲学(1809)、100余年前达尔文的物种原始(1859)来说明物型、物种的变化、形成是生物的生活条件变换结果,不如用我国古代、现代文献及大量事实来说明,更确切而合乎需要.二千余年前,秦朝功利主义者吕不韦等写了一部《吕氏春秋》,中有“橘踰淮而北为枳”的记载.其后,经济学家晏殊把这一记述引用在所著的《晏子春秋》上.清初,我国优秀的选种学家陈十寒写了一部《秘传花镜》(康熙戍辰年),叙述了不同节气、不同土壤、不同培育条件下得到了多种多样的花卉新品种.这些中外典籍中的记述,都说明了一些没有生命的物质条件,建造出新的生命,与“种质论”、“先天论”毫无共同之处.
Citing more than 150 years ago, Lamarck’s philosophy of animal science (1809), more than 100 years ago, Darwin’s species of the original (1859) to illustrate the type, species changes, the formation of living conditions transformation of biological results, as in ancient China, modern literature and large Facts show that it is more exact and desirable.2000 years ago, the Qin dynasty utilitarian Lu Buwei wrote a “Lu’s Spring and Autumn Annals,” there is “orange over Huai and north trifoliate orange.” Subsequently, Yan Shu, an economist, quoted this account in his book entitled “Spring and Autumn Annals of Yanzi.” In the early Qing dynasty, Chen Shih-han, a distinguished Chinese seeded scholar, wrote a novel entitled “A Secret Reading Mirror” (Year of Emperor Kangxi Shu) , Different soil, cultivate under different conditions have been a variety of new varieties of flowers. These Chinese and foreign classics account, have described some of the material conditions without life, build a new life, and “germplasm theory”, “innate On ”nothing in common.