论文部分内容阅读
基于价值多元的现代社会之基本特征,孙斯坦试图运用“未完全理论化协议”对法律推理的性质做出一种有吸引力的实用主义阐释。“未完全理论化协议”强调,法官在法律推理中不应诉诸那些宏大的道德理论,而应在底层原则上或具体结果上达成一致。然而,“未完全理论化协议”不能自动阻止德沃金所说的“辩护梯度上升”;来自于审议民主观的理由也不足以证成这个法律推理的反理论方案。
Based on the basic characteristics of a modern society with multiple values, Sun Stein tried to make an attractive pragmatic interpretation of the nature of legal reasoning using the “incompletely theoretical agreement.” The “incomplete theoretical agreement” emphasizes that judges should not resort to ambitious moral theories in legal reasoning, but should agree on the underlying principle or concrete result. However, the “incomplete theoretical agreement” does not automatically prevent Dworkin’s assertion that “the rise of the defense gradient” is not sufficient to justify the anti-theoretical program of legal reasoning.