论文部分内容阅读
作为一种司法理念或司法方式,中国的能动司法与西方司法能动主义既有知识上的缘脉关系,也有现象上的同质性,但由于各国政治及司法制度的不同,两者亦有一定区别,总体上应将中国能动司法视为世界法治语境中司法能动主义的一种特殊形态。西方司法能动主义是以司法独立性较强、全社会规则化意识较为明确、法官职业化制度较为成熟为基本条件的,因此,对于国情差异较大的中国来说,能动司法在实践形态上对西方司法能动主义应既有保留,又有创新和发展,同时应从多方面建立相应的保障机制。
As a kind of judicial concept or judicial mode, both active judicial and western judicial activism in China have both genetic and phenomenological homogeneity, but due to the different political and judicial systems in different countries, The difference should generally be regarded as a special form of judicial activism in the context of rule of law in the world. The Western judicial activism is based on the basic conditions of a higher judicial independence, a more clear awareness of regularization in the whole society and a more mature system of professional judges. Therefore, for China, which has a big difference in national conditions, Western judicial activism should have both reservations and innovations and developments. At the same time, corresponding safeguard mechanisms should be established in many aspects.