论文部分内容阅读
天价盗窃案件中,由于行为人不能够准确认识其所窃财物的真正价值,导致行为人对盗窃财物的主观认识错误,从而产生了“天价盗窃”的行为结果。这也就导致了我国刑事司法实践中盗窃罪的主观恶性与客观结果的冲突。然而,客观结果显而易见,主观恶性却难以界定。因此,本文通过对“天价”案件的分析,着重解决行为人主观恶性的界定问题,从理论上回应司法实践中的冲突。
In the case of price theft, the perpetrator could not accurately recognize the true value of the stolen property, resulting in the perpetrator’s subjective understanding of the theft of property, which resulted in the behavior of “stolen goods”. This also leads to the conflict between the subjective viciousness of theft and the objective result in our criminal justice practice. However, the objective result is obvious, but the subjective viciousness is difficult to define. Therefore, by analyzing the cases of “Price ”, this paper focuses on the definition of the subjective viciousness of the perpetrator and responds theoretically to the conflicts in judicial practice.