笔者关于规范学生地理答题语言的思路,是由学生对一道月考试题的作答引发的。原题如下:“四大工程的建设有利于我国东西互补、南北相济、资源共享。请写出我国水资源分布的南北差异;能源供需的东西差异;经济发展水平的东西差异。”这道题比较容易,然而学生的回答却很不理想,答案五花八门,如“能源东方少,西方多”“水南边多,北边少”等等。从学生的答案中可以看出,学生了解我国东西部、南北方的资源差异,但由于缺少规范训练,没有把 The author’s ideas on how to regulate a student’s geography answering language are triggered by students’ answers to a monthly exam question. The original questions are as follows: “The construction of the four major projects is conducive to complementing each other in our country and sharing the resources with each other in North and South. Please write down the differences between North and South in the distribution of water resources in our country, the differences in energy supply and demand and the differences in economic development levels.” “ The answer to this question is relatively easy. However, students’ answers are rather poor. There are a wide variety of answers, such as ”less energy in the east, more in the west“, ”more water in the south, less in the north" and so on. As can be seen from the students’ answers, students understand the resource differences between east and west China and north and south China. However, due to the lack of standardized training,