论文部分内容阅读
本文从许霆案入手,通过对秘密窃取和非法占有两个概念的分析,揭示了本案在定性上存在着两个类推:一是把无罪行为类推为盗窃罪;二是把ATM机类推为金融机构。并进一步阐述了类推在我国的现状,说明了类推的危害。
This article begins with the case of Xu Ting. By analyzing the two concepts of secret theft and illegal possession, it reveals that there are two qualitative analogies in the present case: one is to promote innocence into theft; the other is to push ATM machines into finance mechanism. And further elaborates the status of analogy in our country and illustrates the harm of analogy.