论文部分内容阅读
跨国森林治理是全球治理的一个重要内容,学者们对跨国森林治理的行为主体观点迥异,甚至针锋相对。全球管制政治学认为,跨国森林治理并不需要始终贯一的治理主体,治理主体的多元化是当前全球治理的特点。但是,在全球治理不能超越国内政治的条件下,如何获得治理的合法性呢?本文认为,通过制度互动和权力互动能够使得认证标准和第三方认证的权力获得合法性。不过,这种合法性是全球治理与国内政治相互妥协的一种结果,这种治理也是全球治理与国内政治相互妥协的一种治理。
Transnational forest governance is an important part of global governance. Scholars have different or even diametrically opposed views on the actors involved in transnational forest governance. Global regulatory politics believes that transnational forest governance does not require a consistent governance body, and the diversification of governance entities is a characteristic of current global governance. However, under the condition that global governance can not surpass domestic politics, how to obtain the legitimacy of governance? This paper argues that the legitimacy of the power of certification standards and third-party certification can be achieved through institutional interaction and interaction of powers. However, such legitimacy is the result of a compromise between global governance and domestic politics, which is also a form of governance compromised by global governance and domestic politics.