抗战初期 ,国共两党都派出部队转入敌后 ,开展抗日游击战争。但由于两党性质的不同决定其所开展的敌后游击战争存在巨大差异 ,并最终导致其敌后武装力量出现彼消此长的结果。这些差异主要表现在 :两党对开展抗日游击战争的战略意识反映不同 ,出现国民党初期抗战的无序失控和共产党的循序不紊 ;两党开辟敌后战场的战略目的不同 ,这影响到两党抗战态度和国共关系 ;两党在游击战术原则的应用上存在极大差距 ,共产党灵活多变 ,国民党则滑向了阵地战 ;两党对其根据地政权、经济、民众工作等各项建设重视程度不同 ,成效也大相径庭 In the early days of the war of resistance, both the KMT and the CPC dispatched troops to the enemy rear and conducted anti-Japanese guerrilla warfare. However, due to the differences in the nature of the two parties, they decided that there was a huge difference in their guerrilla warfare between the enemy and the enemy and eventually led to the result of the long-term disappearance of armed forces behind enemy lines. These differences are mainly manifested in the differences in the strategic awareness of the two parties in carrying out the anti-Japanese guerrilla war, the disorderly uncontrollability of the KMT during the initial anti-Japanese war and the orderly orderliness of the Communist Party; the different strategic objectives of the two parties in opening up their hostile rear battlefields have affected the anti- Attitudes and the relations between the KMT and the CPPCC. There was a huge gap between the two parties in the application of the principle of guerrilla warfare. The Communist Party was flexible and varied. The Kuomuang slipped to positional warfare. The two parties attached much importance to the construction of their base areas such as political power, economy and public work The results are very different