论文部分内容阅读
法院为本国国际商事仲裁提供取证协助的理论依据在于:(1)法院协助仲裁的必要性以及支持仲裁的政策;(2)国际商事仲裁不仅具有契约性还具有司法性;(3)法院提供取证的协助符合国际商事仲裁的价值取向。通过对德、美、英、法等各国仲裁立法的考察,可以发现尽管各国法院对国际商事仲裁取证的协助在力度上有所差异,不过它们都体现了以下基本内容:协助取证的申请需要由仲裁庭向法院提出或者由当事人经过仲裁庭的同意后向法院提出;注重对被申请人的利益保护;法院提供的取证协助通常受到本国法院程序规则的影响。在我国,《民事诉讼法》和《仲裁法》都未提供法院协助仲裁取证的法律依据。不利推定和证据保全在一定程度上可以作为法院协助仲裁取证的替代措施,但是它们不能完全弥补这种制度上的缺失。我国应当借鉴各国的立法经验,构建国际商事仲裁取证的法院协助制度。
(1) The necessity of courts to assist arbitration and the policies supporting arbitration; (2) International commercial arbitration is not only contractual but also judicial; (3) Courts provide evidence The assistance is in line with the value orientation of international commercial arbitration. Through the investigation of the arbitration legislation of Germany, the United States, Britain, France and other countries, it can be found that although the courts in various countries have made efforts to assist in the evidence collection of international commercial arbitration, they all reflect the following basic contents: The application for assisting forensics needs to be supported by The arbitration tribunal shall propose to the court or the parties concerned with the consent of the arbitration tribunal; pay attention to the protection of the respondent’s interests; and the evidence collection assistance provided by the court is usually influenced by the rules of the court proceedings in the country. In our country, neither the Civil Procedure Law nor the Arbitration Law provides the legal basis for the court to assist in the arbitration. Adverse presuppositions and the preservation of evidence may, to some extent, serve as an alternative to the court’s assistance in arbitration and forensics, but they can not fully remedy this institutional deficiency. Our country should draw lessons from the legislative experience of all countries and construct the system of court assistance in international commercial arbitration and evidence collection.