论文部分内容阅读
中山医科大学附属第一医院心血管内科陈普照等1985年以来对45例确诊为急性心肌梗塞(AMI)患者常规静滴硝酸甘油,与1984年未静滴硝酸甘油的54例相比。静滴组在缓解疼痛方面明显优于对照组(缓解率分别为80%和46.2%),心律失常的并发率也较低(分别为66.6%和98.1%)在泵衰竭的并发率(分别为64.8%和71.1%)和总的近期病死率(23.8%和35.1%)方面两组比较,在统计学上无明显差异,但若按给药早(发病10小时内)晚(发病10小时以上)再分别分成两个亚组相比较,则早期静滴硝酸甘油组的疗效明显优于早期对照组和晚
First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen, Department of Cardiology, such as Chen Puzhao Since 1985, 45 cases of patients diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) routine intravenous nitroglycerin, compared with 1984 did not intravenous nitroglycerin 54 cases compared. The intravenous drip group was significantly better at pain relief than the control group (remission rates were 80% and 46.2%, respectively), and arrhythmia concomitant rates were lower (66.6% and 98.1%, respectively) in pump failure 64.8% and 71.1%) and the total recent mortality (23.8% and 35.1%) in the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference, but if administered as early as (within 10 hours of onset) late (onset of more than 10 hours ) And then were divided into two subgroups compared to the early intravenous nitroglycerin group was significantly better than the early control group and late