《山西中医》1988年5期发表严忠同志《四物汤补血刍议》(简称《刍议》)一文,提出四物汤“既不是一首补血,生血的主方,更不可誉为血虚证之主方。”笔者认为此论有失偏颇,值得进一步商榷。一、关于四物汤的补血作用四物汤有无补血作用,笔者的回答是肯定的。首先,从组方遣药来看,四物汤由熟地、白芍、当归、川芎组成,其中熟地、自芍为补血佳品;当归具补血与活血双重作用,与补血药合用则补血、与活血药相配则活血。《中药学》将当归与熟地、白 “Shanxi Traditional Chinese Medicine” published in 1988 5th article Comrade Yan Zhong’s “Siwu Decoction on Blood Supplements” (referred to as “Proposed”), proposed that Siwutang “is neither a blood-filled, blood-producing party, nor can it be regarded as a blood deficiency syndrome. The main party.” I think this theory is biased and worthy of further discussion. One, on the blood of Siwu Tang Siwu Tang has no blood effect, the author’s answer is yes. First of all, from the perspective of the group’s drug delivery, Siwutang is composed of Rehmannia, Paeonia lactiflora, Angelica, and Chuanxiong. Among them, rehmannia and self-tanning are complementary blood products; while angelica has dual functions of blood and blood circulation, and combined with blood-enriching drugs, blood and blood are combined. Drug matching is blood circulation. “Chinese Medicine” will be Angelica and Rehmannia, White