论文部分内容阅读
在办理贪污犯罪案件中,犯罪嫌疑人往往会辩解将赃款去向用于“公务活动”中,如以存在疑问为由,将用于公务的数额进行去除,这虽然符合“疑罪从无”的精神,但是这却助长了社会不良风气,甚至是助长了社会腐败之风,也成为了诸多犯罪分子逃避法律处罚的“法宝”。而按照我国目前对于贪污罪中的举证责任,赃款去向问题应由检察机关进行查证,由于对于赃款去向用于何处的问题犯罪嫌疑人往往可能是案件中唯一的知情人,如其不进行供述,便无从查起,因此一味强调检察机关的举证责任,势必会人为地放纵犯罪,后患无穷。
In the case of corruption crimes, suspects often justify the use of stolen money for “official activities ”. If there is doubt, the amount used for official duties will be removed, although this is consistent with the “ No ”spirit, but this has contributed to the social unhealthy atmosphere, and even contributed to the social corruption, but also has become the“ magic weapon ”for many criminals to evade legal punishment. According to our current burden of proof in the crime of embezzlement, the question of the whereabouts of the illicit money should be verified by the procuratorial organs. Since the suspects are often the only ones who know where the illicit money is going to go, if they do not make any confession, It is impossible to find out, so blindly emphasize the burden of proof of procuratorial organs, it is bound to indulge in artificially indulging crimes and suffering endless trouble.