论文部分内容阅读
传统的法理学或者法学习惯于将权利与义务的关系视为法律领域最重要的法现象,将权利与义务的对应关系作为分析和解释所有法律问题的两个基本的范畴,可是对于“权利”和“义务”的内涵,以及“权力”的地位如何,“权利”和“权力”的关系又如何,却是模糊不清,而“权利义务关系”更是停留于表面,而不去深挖“权利”、“义务”、“权力”背后所潜藏的社会性内容,无论是理论上还是实践上都留有极大缺憾。
Traditional jurisprudence or jurisprudence is used to regard the relationship between rights and obligations as the most important law phenomenon in the field of law. The correspondence between rights and obligations is taken as the two basic categories for analyzing and explaining all legal issues. However, “And ” obligation “connotation, and ” power “status, ” rights “and ” power “how the relationship, but it is ambiguous, and ” rights and obligations “It is to stay on the surface and not to dig deeper into the hidden social content behind” rights, “” obligations, “and” power. "There are both great pitfalls in theory and in practice.