论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较钬激光与气压弹道碎石术治疗肾结石的临床疗效。方法:研究对象选取本院2012年6月至2014年5月收治的96例肾结石患者,随机方法分组。A组患者接受钬激光碎石术治疗,B组患者接受气压弹道碎石术治疗。对比分析两组患者结石一次排净率、并发症发生率的差异性。结果:经过治疗后A组患者结石一次排净率明显高于B组,并发症发生率明显低于B组,经卡方检验分析发现组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:钬激光与气压弹道碎石术治疗肾结石均具有一定的治疗效果,其中钬激光碎石术碎石效果更好,并发症更少,具有更大的临床优势。
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of kidney stones. Methods: The study selected 96 patients with nephrolithiasis admitted from June 2012 to May 2014 in our hospital and were divided into two groups randomly. Patients in group A received holmium laser lithotripsy, and patients in group B received pneumatic lithotripsy. Comparative analysis of two groups of patients with stone once net row rate, the incidence of complications. Results: After treatment, the group of patients with stones in group A was significantly higher than those in group B, and the complication rate was significantly lower than that in group B. The chi square test showed that there was significant difference between groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: Both holmium laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy have a certain therapeutic effect on kidney stones. Holmium laser lithotripsy is more effective and has fewer complications and has more clinical advantages.