论文部分内容阅读
本刊讯自2月5日,一年一度的、为戏剧界与广大观众所瞩目的“梅花奖”评选开始以后,全体评委与评选办公室的全体工作人员投入了紧张的工作。评委们极其认真地回顾与评论了一年来首都舞台的状况,细致地、实事求是地分析了每个演员的成绩与缺点;评选办公室在归纳、整理了大量的读者推荐书的建议与意见的同时,连续分别举行了多次的戏剧专家、读者、业余戏剧工作者与观众代表的座谈会。评委会
The newsletter from February 5, once a year, for the drama and the audience attracted the attention of the “plum prize” selection began, all the judges and the selection office of the entire staff devoted a lot of work. The judges reviewed and commented the status of the capital stage for the past year with utmost seriousness and analyzed the achievements and shortcomings of each actor in a meticulous and realistic manner. While the selection office summed up and sorted out a large number of suggestions and opinions from readers’ testimonials, In succession, several symposiums were held respectively for theatrical experts, readers, amateur theater workers and audience representatives. Jury