论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析Mammotome旋切术和区段切除术治疗乳腺良性肿物的疗效。方法选取我院2010年1月～12月收治的60例乳腺良性肿物患者,在征得患者同意的情况下分为观察组和对照组各30例。观察组患者采用Mammotome旋切术治疗,对照组采用区段切除术治疗,比较两组患者的疗效。结果两组在肿物切除、术后复发、术后血肿发生方面比较,无显著性差异,P>0.05,具有可比性。两组在手术时间、住院时间、手术切口长度、切口皮下发生淤血率方面比较,观察组明显优于对照组,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论 Mammotome旋切术和区段切除术均能够有效的治疗乳腺良性肿物,但Mammotome旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿物的疗效明显优于区段切除术,具有手术时间短、切口小、恢复快的特点,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the curative effect of Mammotome excision and radical resection in the treatment of benign breast tumor. Methods Sixty patients with benign breast tumor admitted from January 2010 to December 2010 in our hospital were divided into observation group (30 cases) and control group (30 cases) with the consent of patients. The patients in the observation group were treated with Mammotome excision. The control group was treated with segmentectomy. The curative effect was compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in tumor resection, postoperative recurrence and postoperative hematoma, P> 0.05, comparable. The two groups in operation time, hospital stay, surgical incision length, incision subcutaneous congestion rate, the observation group was significantly better than the control group, P <0.05, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusions Both Mammotome excision and segmentectomy can effectively treat benign breast tumor. However, Mammotome excision is superior to segmentectomy in the treatment of benign breast tumor, which has the advantages of short operative time, small incision, rapid recovery The characteristics of clinical promotion is worth.