论文部分内容阅读
关于北魏前期百官无禄制的问题 ,《魏书》并无明确记载 ,始倡此说者为唐人杜佑。清人赵翼正式确立《后魏百官无禄》的论点 ,史学界多遵循此说。然而 ,也有此制始行于西晋末期永嘉之乱后的说法。我以为此说有误 ,并以十六国时期百官有禄的事实证明之。当北魏前期实行百官无禄制时 ,一般认为其缓解因无禄造成的社会矛盾的办法 ,是“唯藉商贾取利而抽分之”。我却认为这不是主要的办法 ,主要而长期实行的办法是对百官实行以战利品的再分配制度为特征的班赏制度。
On the early Northern Wei Dynasty Baal non-disclosure system, “Wei Shu” did not clearly documented, was the advocate of this speaker for the Du You. Qing Zhao Yi formally established the “post-Wei Baogong non-Paul,” the argument, historians and more follow this. However, this system also started after the chaos of Yongjia in the late Western Jin Dynasty. I think this is wrong, and proved by the fact that there are all kinds of officials in the sixteen-nation period. When the early Northern Wei dynasty practiced the system of non-disclosure, it is generally believed that its solution to social conflicts caused by non-Paul is “only by taking advantage of merchants and pumping points.” I think this is not the main method. The main and long-term solution is to introduce a system of class tours featuring the redistribution system of loot.