我中华民族历来贵文字,孔子有“辞达”(《论语·卫吴公》)即文字要达意的教海,曾子更有“出辞气”“远鄙倍”(《论语·泰伯》)即为文要避免鄙陋粗野和错误的具体要求。中间虽有标榜“惟务养情性,其他则不学”的理学家,斥“为文”是“玩物”、“害道”和“俳优”(《二程遗书》卷一八)。但是,到了清代,学人又已将这种观点斥为“陋懦不学”而重新主张“以文为贵”、“文欲其工”了;并论证之曰:“文固所以载理,文不备、则理不明也。 I have always been the Chinese language, Confucius has “speech” (“Analects of Confucius Wei Gong”) that the text should be intended to teach the sea, Zeng more “out of rhetoric” “far scrutiny times” (“The Analects of Confucius Tabor” ) Is the text to avoid the despicable crude and wrong specific requirements. Although the middle class boasts “rationalistic feelings, others do not learn”, the Neo-Confucianists denounce “as the text” as “plaything”, “harm” and “evil” (Volume II). However, in the Qing Dynasty, scholars had denounced this view as “not trying to learn” and reasserted “taking literature as your point of reference” and " Reason, the text is not prepared, the reason is unknown.