论文部分内容阅读
齐格蒙特·鲍曼在全面研究现代性的秩序和同化本质时,在哲学存在论意义上提出现代性的矛盾性(Ambivalence)思想。认为典型的现代实践不是建构他世界(Other World),而是在建构我们这个世界的“他者”(The Other)。作为秩序的他者具有纯粹的否定性,即不确定性,是一切恐惧的源泉和原型。鲍曼通过分析“布朗运动”和“西西弗斯的苦难”将矛盾性与现代碎片化直接关联,从而使矛盾性诞生于现代存在(Modern Existerce)的焦躁行动,而现代意识又使得差异成为罪过。后现代精神和实践都呈现矛盾状况,而后现代的矛盾性后果很可能把宿命变成好运,将宽容变成协同,这是一种后现代共同体的生存状态。现代社会是现代性的,后现代社会是矛盾性的。在后工业社会状况下,协同性是人们应求的有根性生存。
In a comprehensive study of the order and assimilation of modernity, Zygmunt Baumann proposed the ambivalence of modernity in the philosophical ontological sense. It is not typical modern practice to construct “Other World” but “The Other” that constructs our world. The Other, as an order, has a pure negation, namely uncertainty, as the source and prototype of all fear. Bauman directly linked contradiction with modern fragmentation by analyzing “Brownian Motion” and “The Silence of Sisyphus,” so that paradox was born into the anxious action of Modern Existerce. And modern consciousness Make the difference a sin. Postmodernism and practice present contradictions, and the contradictory consequences of post-modernism are likely to turn destiny into good fortune and intolerance into synergy, which is the survival of a post-modern community. Modern society is modern, post-modern society is contradictory. In post-industrial societies, synergies are the subsistence that people demand.