头脑里总在思索着一个问题,在上海市高级人民法院的大法官们的心目中,谁才是真正的“刁民”?这家位于上海的代表人民利益的高级法院近日出台了一条原则意见,公开宣称:“经营者对故意购假的消费者不构成欺诈。对‘知假买假’或‘诱假买假’的消费者要求经营者按《消费者权益保护法》第49条之规定承担’退一赔一’责任的诉讼请求,法院将不予支 There is always a question in mind. Who is the real “trouble-making people” in the minds of the judges of the Shanghai Municipal Higher People's Court? The Shanghai Higher Court, which represents the interests of the people, recently issued a principle opinion , Declaring publicly: “The operator does not constitute fraudulent consumer deliberate purchase of fake.For the 'know the fake buying fake' or 'fake buying fake' consumers require the operator according to the” Consumer Protection Law "Article 49 The court shall not give any claim for litigation that takes the responsibility of 'refunding one payment for another'