黄某、崔某、王某寻衅滋事案中,三名嫌疑人先酒后滋事后妨害公务,对于三名嫌疑人的行为应如何定性,其争议的焦点在于先后两个行为的犯意是否具有连续性,即是基于同一犯意实施两个行为还是基于两个犯意实施两个行为。本文结合刑法基本理论及司法实践对其进行评析。 Hwang, Choi, Wang provoke trouble in the case, the three suspects prejudice obstruction of public service for the behavior of the three suspects how to characterize the focus of its dispute is whether the two successive acts of intentions have a continuous Sexuality, that is, based on the same intentional implementation of the two acts or based on two guilty of the implementation of two acts. This article analyzes the basic theory of criminal law and judicial practice.