“塔克尔—伍德命题”引发的“马克思与正义”之争实质上是一场关于马克思主义的“人道主义”与“科学主义”争论。英美马克思主义者围绕马克思对“分配正义”的批判而产生的马克思“道德论”与“非道德论”分歧是人道主义的马克思主义与科学主义的马克思主义在研究视角和理论旨趣上的必然反映,他们的探索为马克思和马克思主义研究提供了新的范式,积累了新的知识资源。同时,他们的缺陷和不足也启示我们:对马克思和马克思主义理论的研究必须回到马克思,回到历史唯物主义和辩证法,坚持历史尺度与价值尺度、科学理性与价值理性的辩证统一,这才是理解马克思和把握马克思主义真谛的科学原则与正确方法。 The dispute between “Marx and Justice” triggered by “Tucker - Wood Proposition” is essentially an argument about the “humanitarianism” and “scientism” of Marxism. The disagreement between Marxism, “moral theory” and “non-ethical theory” produced by Anglo-American Marxists around Marx’s critique of “distribution of justice ” is the difference between humanitarian Marxism and scientism Marxism in the research perspective and The inevitable reflection on the theoretical interest, their exploration provides a new paradigm for the study of Marxism and Marxism and accumulates new knowledge resources. At the same time, their flaws and inadequacies also suggest that we must return to Marxism and Marxist theory back to historical materialism and dialectics, insist on the dialectical unity of historical scale and value yardstick, scientific rationality and value rationality It is the scientific principle and correct method to understand Marxism and grasp the true meaning of Marxism.