论文部分内容阅读
司法逻辑是一种客观逻辑,刑法的司法逻辑精神是一种客观精神,对此要在刑法自身结构中的自生性(内部性)与建构性(外部性)的矛盾中理解。《刑法》第1条乃是这种精神之总成,其中“结合”与“为了”之表述体现此精神尤为明显。在司法逻辑中,控方以《刑法》第2条为总依据的追诉偏好刑法的外部性,而辩方所偏好的则是刑法的内部性。内部论的刑法本体论和无知论的刑法认识论是理解《刑法》第3至5条罪刑法定主义的司法逻辑的哲学基础。实现刑事正义的关键不在于刑法确定不确定,而在于摆脱独断论、图像论、刑法外部性等种种束缚,从主体间性、语境论、刑法内部性上发现刑事正义的司法逻辑进路。
Judicial logic is an objective logic, and the judicial logic of criminal law is an objective spirit, which should be understood in the contradiction between the spontaneous (internal) and the constructive (external) in the structure of criminal law itself. Article 1 of the Criminal Law is an assembly of such spirits, of which the spirit of “combining” and “for the sake of” is particularly evident. In the judicial logic, prosecutors favor the externality of criminal law based on article 2 of the Criminal Law, while the defense prefers the internal part of criminal law. The ontology of criminal law ontology and ignorance of criminal law epistemology are the philosophical basis for understanding the judicial logic of the criminal statutory sanctions in Articles 3 to 5 of the Criminal Law. The key to realize criminal justice lies not in the uncertainty of the criminal law, but in getting away from all kinds of restraints such as doctrine of autocratic theory, image theory and externality of criminal law and so on, and found the way of judicial logic of criminal justice from the perspective of intersubjectivity, context and criminal law.