本文运用语言学(词汇学、语义学、语体学及修辞学等)和传播学(口语传播学与大众传播学)的相关知识对“杨××状告胡××一案”中的两处言词证据做了分析,认为:⑴在一审中,原告发给被告的手机短信具有性暗示的性质;⑵在上诉状中,辩方律师认为“网络日志(博客)”与传统日志的性质相同是不准确的,被告的博客具有大众传播的性质。 This article uses the knowledge of linguistics (lexicology, semantics, stylistics and rhetoric, etc.) and communication (colloquialism and mass communication) knowledge of “Yang × × sued Hu × × case” (2) In the first instance, the plaintiff sent a text message to the defendant with the nature of suggestion; (2) In the pleadings, the defense counsel thought that the “blog” and the traditional The nature of the log is inaccurate, and the defendant’s blog has the nature of mass communication.