论文部分内容阅读
There are now well over 1，000 colleges and universities that don’t require SAT or ACT1 scores in deciding whom to admit， a number that’s growing every year. And a new study finds that scores on those tests are of little value in predicting students’ performance in college， and raises the question： Should those tests be required at all？
Colleges that have gone “test optional” enroll—and graduate—a higher proportion of low-income and first generation-students2， and more students from diverse backgrounds， the researchers found in the study， Defining Access： How Test-Optional Works.
“Our research clearly demonstrates that these students graduate often at a higher rate，” said Steve Syverson， an assistant vice chancellor at the University of Washington Bothell， and co-author of the study.
“When a college considers going test-optional， one of the first reactions that people， including alumni， feel is that the college will be admitting less qualified students，” he added. Syverson says the study should reassure admissions officials who’ve decided to go test-optional.
Syverson and his team of researchers studied 28 public and private institutions that no longer require test scores， and tracked about 956，000 individual student records.
Students like Ian Haimowitz， a sophomore at George Washington University， a test-optional school in Washington D.C.
He says in the beginning， he felt like a fish out of water.
“I know for a fact I’m the first Nicaraguan-American， the first Latino， the first Jewish Latino that a lot of kids meet，” he says.
He adds that when he arrived at GW， he looked around and asked himself， “What am I doing here with kids who went to private schools and got the best education possible？”
It was a very different world than he grew up in back in New Mexico.
“I remember my freshman year of high school， I didn’t have a math teacher. Maybe that’s why you see in my test score that I didn’t have a good grounding in math. But I believed my potential was still there.”
Ian was a straight-A student in high school， but his SAT scores were so low he didn’t think any top tier school would accept him. He says not having to submit his test scores opened the doors to a top selective school.
This year， George Washington received about 26，500 undergraduate applications from all over the country. Close to 20 percent did not submit their test scores， which GW says has helped enroll more students from diverse backgrounds. Still， some researchers question the impact that test-optional admissions policies have had on schools.
Jack Buckley， a senior vice president at the American Institutes for Research， notes that while diversity improved at schools that have gone test-optional， that also happened “at the same rate among those that didn’t.”
In other words， says Buckley， test-optional schools are not more effective in enrolling minorities than schools that still require test scores.
Syverson says that’s not what the evidence in his study is showing. “We certainly are not arguing that everyone should abolish test scores，” he says. “Test scores do have some value.”
Syverson insists that his study shows that tests can be an obstacle not just for students who don’t test well， but for students from under-served， under-represented populations.
More importantly， he adds， you can admit pretty good students by looking at something other than test scores.
That’s been the experience at George Washington University. “Our experience is actually that （students’） high school performance predicts college performance extremely well，” says Forrest Maltzman， the university’s provost and chief academic officer.
Maltzman says that whatever helped students be successful in high school tends to work for them in college： “Standardized tests don’t get at that.”
Two years worth of data show that students who got into GW with high test scores performed no better as freshman and sophomores than those who got in without submitting their test scores， he says.
“The added value of test scores in predicting performance today is really very very minimal，” Maltzman argues. “The best thing these tests match up with is actually family income.”
And that， says Syverson， is consistent with his team’s findings. Still， he cautions that test optional policies are no panacea. They’re just another way to make college more accessible.
“Our study clearly supports the notion that if an institution wants to do a better job serving traditionally under-served populations， test optional （policies） can provide a very useful tool.”
目前有1000多所高校在錄取学生时不要求学术能力评估测试（SAT）或美国大学入学考试（ACT）成绩，而且这样的高校在逐年增多。一项新研究发现，这两项考试成绩对预测学生入学后表现的参考价值有限。这就带出一个问题：这些考试真的必要吗？
实行“非强制性考试入学”的高校中，来自低收入家庭、“学一代”的生源录取率和毕业率更高，学生的家庭背景更多样。这是研究人员在《定义机会：非强制性考试入学运作方式》研究报告中得出的结论。
“我们的研究表明，这类学生的毕业率往往更高。”本项研究的作者之一、华盛顿大学博塞尔校区助理副校长史蒂夫·赛弗森说。
“一所大学若打算通过非强制性考试来招收学生，那么引发的第一反应会是，就连往届生也会担忧这样录取到的学生要差一等。”赛弗森表示，这一研究应该能打消本打算实行此政策的招生人员的顾虑。 赛弗森和他的研究团队调查了28所不再要求考试成绩的公立和私立大学，对95.6万名学生做了追踪调查。
就读于乔治·华盛顿大学的大二学生伊恩·哈伊莫威茨就是其中之一，位于华府的这所大学就实行非强制性考试入学政策。
他说，起初感觉自己像一条离了水的鱼儿。
“有个事儿我敢肯定，我是很多同学见到的头一个尼加拉瓜裔美国人，头一个拉丁裔美国人，头一个拉丁裔犹太人。”
他还说，刚踏进学校那会儿，四下一看，就自己问自己：“他们都是在私立学校接受过最好教育的，我来这儿掺和什么？”
他从小在新墨西哥州长大，两地真是天差地别。
“记得我高一的时候没有数学老师。这可能就是你从考试成绩看出我数学基础不好的缘由。但我相信自己是有潜力的。”
读高中时，伊恩是优等生，但他的SAT成绩却很低，他觉得没有哪所一流大学会录取自己。他说，无须提交考试成绩的政策，为他敲开了重点大学之门。
今年，乔治·华盛顿大学收到了来自美国各地2.65万份读本科申请。近20%的学生没有提交考试成绩，校方表示，这有助于招收更多来自不同背景的学生。
尽管如此，一些研究人员对非强制性考试录取政策带给院校的影响仍抱有疑虑。
美国研究院高级副院长杰克·巴克利指出，尽管实行非强制性考试入学政策提升了学校的生源多样性，但“未实行该政策的学校生源多样性也在同步提升。”
巴克利解释说，换言之，在录取少数族裔方面，非强制性考试院校的表现并不比强制考试院校好多少。
赛弗森说，他的研究并未得出这一结论。“我们当然不是说每所学校都应摒弃考试分数，考试成绩确实有一定的价值。”
赛弗森坚称，他的研究表明，考试不仅是考试失利学生的一道门槛，对学习条件落后的弱势群体学生也是如此。
他补充道，更重要的是，考查除成绩外的其他方面，也可以招到相当优秀的学生。
这就是乔治·华盛顿大学的经验。该校教务长兼首席学术官福里斯特·马尔茨曼说：“我们的经验是，从学生高中的表现能很好地预测其大学表现。”
马尔茨曼指出，让学生在高中阶段表现优异的品质，往往在大学期间也会起作用，“标准化考试可检测不出这种品质”。
他还说，两年的数据显示，高分进入乔治·华盛顿大学的学生在大一和大二时的表现并不比未提交考试成绩的学生好。
“考试成绩对学术评估的附加值微乎其微，”马尔茨曼认为，“和这些考试成绩最匹配的倒是家庭收入。”
赛弗森说，这一点与他团队的发现是一致的。不过，他提醒道，测试可选政策并不是灵丹妙药，只不过是让大学不再遥不可及的另一种途径。
“我们的研究明确支持这样的看法：一所大学若是真的为那些从来就没有获得充分教育的人群着想，那么非强制性考试入学（政策）会是非常奏效的一招。”
（译者为“《英语世界》杯”翻译大賽获奖者）
Colleges that have gone “test optional” enroll—and graduate—a higher proportion of low-income and first generation-students2， and more students from diverse backgrounds， the researchers found in the study， Defining Access： How Test-Optional Works.
“Our research clearly demonstrates that these students graduate often at a higher rate，” said Steve Syverson， an assistant vice chancellor at the University of Washington Bothell， and co-author of the study.
“When a college considers going test-optional， one of the first reactions that people， including alumni， feel is that the college will be admitting less qualified students，” he added. Syverson says the study should reassure admissions officials who’ve decided to go test-optional.
Syverson and his team of researchers studied 28 public and private institutions that no longer require test scores， and tracked about 956，000 individual student records.
Students like Ian Haimowitz， a sophomore at George Washington University， a test-optional school in Washington D.C.
He says in the beginning， he felt like a fish out of water.
“I know for a fact I’m the first Nicaraguan-American， the first Latino， the first Jewish Latino that a lot of kids meet，” he says.
He adds that when he arrived at GW， he looked around and asked himself， “What am I doing here with kids who went to private schools and got the best education possible？”
It was a very different world than he grew up in back in New Mexico.
“I remember my freshman year of high school， I didn’t have a math teacher. Maybe that’s why you see in my test score that I didn’t have a good grounding in math. But I believed my potential was still there.”
Ian was a straight-A student in high school， but his SAT scores were so low he didn’t think any top tier school would accept him. He says not having to submit his test scores opened the doors to a top selective school.
This year， George Washington received about 26，500 undergraduate applications from all over the country. Close to 20 percent did not submit their test scores， which GW says has helped enroll more students from diverse backgrounds. Still， some researchers question the impact that test-optional admissions policies have had on schools.
Jack Buckley， a senior vice president at the American Institutes for Research， notes that while diversity improved at schools that have gone test-optional， that also happened “at the same rate among those that didn’t.”
In other words， says Buckley， test-optional schools are not more effective in enrolling minorities than schools that still require test scores.
Syverson says that’s not what the evidence in his study is showing. “We certainly are not arguing that everyone should abolish test scores，” he says. “Test scores do have some value.”
Syverson insists that his study shows that tests can be an obstacle not just for students who don’t test well， but for students from under-served， under-represented populations.
More importantly， he adds， you can admit pretty good students by looking at something other than test scores.
That’s been the experience at George Washington University. “Our experience is actually that （students’） high school performance predicts college performance extremely well，” says Forrest Maltzman， the university’s provost and chief academic officer.
Maltzman says that whatever helped students be successful in high school tends to work for them in college： “Standardized tests don’t get at that.”
Two years worth of data show that students who got into GW with high test scores performed no better as freshman and sophomores than those who got in without submitting their test scores， he says.
“The added value of test scores in predicting performance today is really very very minimal，” Maltzman argues. “The best thing these tests match up with is actually family income.”
And that， says Syverson， is consistent with his team’s findings. Still， he cautions that test optional policies are no panacea. They’re just another way to make college more accessible.
“Our study clearly supports the notion that if an institution wants to do a better job serving traditionally under-served populations， test optional （policies） can provide a very useful tool.”
目前有1000多所高校在錄取学生时不要求学术能力评估测试（SAT）或美国大学入学考试（ACT）成绩，而且这样的高校在逐年增多。一项新研究发现，这两项考试成绩对预测学生入学后表现的参考价值有限。这就带出一个问题：这些考试真的必要吗？
实行“非强制性考试入学”的高校中，来自低收入家庭、“学一代”的生源录取率和毕业率更高，学生的家庭背景更多样。这是研究人员在《定义机会：非强制性考试入学运作方式》研究报告中得出的结论。
“我们的研究表明，这类学生的毕业率往往更高。”本项研究的作者之一、华盛顿大学博塞尔校区助理副校长史蒂夫·赛弗森说。
“一所大学若打算通过非强制性考试来招收学生，那么引发的第一反应会是，就连往届生也会担忧这样录取到的学生要差一等。”赛弗森表示，这一研究应该能打消本打算实行此政策的招生人员的顾虑。 赛弗森和他的研究团队调查了28所不再要求考试成绩的公立和私立大学，对95.6万名学生做了追踪调查。
就读于乔治·华盛顿大学的大二学生伊恩·哈伊莫威茨就是其中之一，位于华府的这所大学就实行非强制性考试入学政策。
他说，起初感觉自己像一条离了水的鱼儿。
“有个事儿我敢肯定，我是很多同学见到的头一个尼加拉瓜裔美国人，头一个拉丁裔美国人，头一个拉丁裔犹太人。”
他还说，刚踏进学校那会儿，四下一看，就自己问自己：“他们都是在私立学校接受过最好教育的，我来这儿掺和什么？”
他从小在新墨西哥州长大，两地真是天差地别。
“记得我高一的时候没有数学老师。这可能就是你从考试成绩看出我数学基础不好的缘由。但我相信自己是有潜力的。”
读高中时，伊恩是优等生，但他的SAT成绩却很低，他觉得没有哪所一流大学会录取自己。他说，无须提交考试成绩的政策，为他敲开了重点大学之门。
今年，乔治·华盛顿大学收到了来自美国各地2.65万份读本科申请。近20%的学生没有提交考试成绩，校方表示，这有助于招收更多来自不同背景的学生。
尽管如此，一些研究人员对非强制性考试录取政策带给院校的影响仍抱有疑虑。
美国研究院高级副院长杰克·巴克利指出，尽管实行非强制性考试入学政策提升了学校的生源多样性，但“未实行该政策的学校生源多样性也在同步提升。”
巴克利解释说，换言之，在录取少数族裔方面，非强制性考试院校的表现并不比强制考试院校好多少。
赛弗森说，他的研究并未得出这一结论。“我们当然不是说每所学校都应摒弃考试分数，考试成绩确实有一定的价值。”
赛弗森坚称，他的研究表明，考试不仅是考试失利学生的一道门槛，对学习条件落后的弱势群体学生也是如此。
他补充道，更重要的是，考查除成绩外的其他方面，也可以招到相当优秀的学生。
这就是乔治·华盛顿大学的经验。该校教务长兼首席学术官福里斯特·马尔茨曼说：“我们的经验是，从学生高中的表现能很好地预测其大学表现。”
马尔茨曼指出，让学生在高中阶段表现优异的品质，往往在大学期间也会起作用，“标准化考试可检测不出这种品质”。
他还说，两年的数据显示，高分进入乔治·华盛顿大学的学生在大一和大二时的表现并不比未提交考试成绩的学生好。
“考试成绩对学术评估的附加值微乎其微，”马尔茨曼认为，“和这些考试成绩最匹配的倒是家庭收入。”
赛弗森说，这一点与他团队的发现是一致的。不过，他提醒道，测试可选政策并不是灵丹妙药，只不过是让大学不再遥不可及的另一种途径。
“我们的研究明确支持这样的看法：一所大学若是真的为那些从来就没有获得充分教育的人群着想，那么非强制性考试入学（政策）会是非常奏效的一招。”
（译者为“《英语世界》杯”翻译大賽获奖者）