国际商事仲裁缺员仲裁庭裁决效力问题研究——马绍尔群岛第一投资公司申请承认与执行伦敦海事仲裁裁决案述评

来源 :国际经济法学刊 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:tb0401292
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
缺员仲裁庭裁决的效力问题是国际公法界和国际商事仲裁界数十年来争论的焦点,至今尚未有定论。本文以马绍尔群岛第一投资公司申请承认与执行伦敦海事仲裁裁决案为例,深入剖析了围绕缺员仲裁庭裁决效力问题的“均衡说”及“效力说”的理论纷争以及国际实践的分歧,对我国法院如何看待缺员仲裁庭裁决的效力提出了详细对策建议。 The issue of the validity of the arbitration tribunals’ rulings has not been definitively debated in decades of debate among the international public law community and the international commercial arbitration community. This paper takes the Marshall Islands First Investment Corporation as an example to apply for the recognition and enforcement of the London maritime arbitration award as an example. It analyzes in depth the theoretical dispute over the validity of the adjudication effect of the absence of the arbitration tribunal and the theoretical dispute between the international The disagreements on practice put forward detailed countermeasures on how our courts view the effectiveness of arbitration tribunals’ rulings.
其他文献