“中国现代文学史”以不言自明的时间逻辑,获取了文学史长河中1917-1949这一个时段的管辖权,却以经意识形态过滤的“现代”标尺清除异己,把许多重要的文学现象排除在文学史体系之外。现行的文学史通过贬低晚清白话文运动,省略同时代非“新文学圈”作家的贡献,漠视北洋政府的作为,来建构新文学的发生地图,达到纯化、神化新文学发生史的效果。把现代文学史笼罩在新文学的霸权话语下,以新文学的“独家逻辑”来阐述1917-1949的文学发展,文学史多元共生的格局被肢解、简化,最终使得文学史的叙述仅仅成为一家之言。 “History of Modern Chinese Literature ” with self-evident time logic, access to the long history of literature in the 1917-1949 this period of jurisdiction, but with ideological filtering “modern ” scale to eliminate dissidents, the many important Literary phenomena are excluded from the literary history system. The present literary history constructs the map of the occurrence of new literature through devaluing the activities of the vernacular vernacular movement in the late Qing Dynasty and omitting the contributions made by writers of non-literary circles in the late Qing Dynasty, ignoring the Beiyang government and achieving the effect of purifying and deifying the new literature history . Under the hegemonic discourse of new literature, the modern literary history is covered with the “exclusive logic” of new literature to expound the literary development of 1917-1949. The pattern of multiple symbiosis of literary history is dismembered and simplified, and the narrative of literary history is finally made merely Become a saying