论文部分内容阅读
目的：比较胃三角吻合术与BillrothI吻合术在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中短期疗效。 方法：选取解放军总医院2009-2013年间37例行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的早期胃癌患者资料，其中14例行胃三角吻合术（三角吻合组），23例行BillrothI吻合术（BillrothI吻合组），比较两组术中及术后的相关指标。 结果：与BillrothI吻合组比较，三角吻合组手术时间延长，但术中出血量降低，止痛泵使用时间、术后排气时间、拆线时间均缩短，差异均有统计学意义（均P0.05）。术后病理显示，三角吻合组近、远端切缘距肿瘤的平均距离均明显大于BillrothI吻合组（均P0.05）。结论：三角吻合能一定程度减少腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者的创伤、疼痛，降低腔镜下操作难度及感染的风险，加速患者胃肠道功能恢复。“,”Objective: To compare the short-term efficacy of the delta-shaped anastomosis and Billroth I anastomosis in laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy. Methods: The records of 37 patients with early-stage gastric cancer undergoing laparosicopic radical distal gastrectomy in PLA General Hospital between 2009 and 2013 were selected. Of the patients, 14 cases received delta-shaped anastomosis (delta-shaped anastomosis group) and 23 cases were subjected to Billroth I anastomosis (Billroth I anastomosis group), and the relevant intraoperative and postoperative parameters between the two groups were compared. Results: In delta-shaped anastomosis group compared with Billroth I anastomosis group, the operative time wasprolonged, but the intraoperative blood loss was reduced, duration of the analgesic pump therapy, and time to ifrst lfatus and suture removal were all shortened, and all the differences had statistical signiifcance (allP0.05). Postoperative pathology showed that the distance of the proximal and distal surgical margins from the tumor in delta-shaped anastomosis group was significantly longer than those in Billroth I anastomosis group (bothP0.05). Conclusion: The delta-shaped anastomosis can, to a certain degree, reduce the trauma and pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy, decrease the operative diffculty of laparoscopic surgery and the risk of infection, and promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function of the patients.