论文部分内容阅读
古-k韵尾字与二合无音au、ou、ai、ei的对应,从现代汉语的情况看,是北纬37°以北地区方言的特点。但这并不意味着在北纬37°以南地区的汉语方言中,根本不存在这种对应。本文以文献和方言资料为依据,认为古-k韵尾字与二合元音的对应在历史上曾经普遍分布于北纬37°南北的广大地区。只是由于后来(大约从北宋开始)在北纬37°以南发生了新一轮的语音变化(二合元音au、ai等趋于单化),而在北纬37°以北则没有发生,这才造成了两个方言区现在的上述差异。本文还以为,共同语读书音的发展滞后于口语音的现象有助于推测口语音中一些变化产生的时代;现代北京方言中古药、铎、觉、陌、麦、职等韵的所谓文读,也并非从北京方言自身中发展出来,而是来自洛阳、开封方言较新阶段的读音。
The correspondence between the ancient-k verse characters and the unharmed au, ou, ai, and ei is a characteristic of dialects in the north of north latitude 37 ° from the situation of modern Chinese. However, this does not mean that there is no such correspondence at all in the Chinese dialects south of 37 ° N. Based on the literature and dialect data, this paper argues that the correspondence between the ancient-kun-mei and the vowel vowels has been widely distributed in the vast area of north and south 37 ° north latitude in history. It was only because a new round of phonetic changes occurred in the 37 ° N latitude later (about the Northern Song Dynasty) (diatonic au, ai, etc. tend to be singular) and did not occur at 37 ° north latitude This has caused the difference between the two dialects now. This article also believes that the development of common language pronunciation lags behind the phenomenon of spoken voice helps to speculate the age of some changes in oral speech; the so-called essay of modern Chinese dialect of ancient medicine, Duo, Qi, Mo, Mai, , But also not from Beijing dialect itself developed, but from the Luoyang, Kaifeng dialect more recent pronunciation.