由于缺乏法律关系主体之间应有的相关性、对称性、可逆性和双向性,后代人和动物难以拥有法律主体地位。如果给后代人、动物、胎儿及死者以法律主体地位就能实现对它们所谓的权益的(实质上那是我们自己的)保护目的,何乐而不为呢?问题是,当我们要给它们权利时,却发现对象不存在,或无法与我们沟通,或它们无以知晓其权利,它们无以行使其权利,它们无以委托行使其权利,它们也无法享受侵害赔偿和补偿……增加当代人的权利义务规定如环境危险之债,倒是行之有效的方法。 Due to the lack of relativity, symmetry, reversibility and two-way between the subjects of legal relationship, it is difficult for the descendants and animals to have the legal subject status. The question is why we should not give protection to the so-called rights of our descendants, animals, fetuses, and the dead, which are essentially our own rights, in the legal subject. The problem is that when we give them Right, they find that the object does not exist, or can not communicate with us, or they are not aware of their rights, they are unable to exercise their rights, they are not entrusted to exercise their rights, and they can not enjoy the benefits of compensation and compensation ... Human rights and obligations of the provisions of the debt of environmental risk, it is an effective method.