当前,信访部门在对政府决策和公共政策上的影响力还相对较低,其工作重点仍在个案解决上,具有典型的“一事一议”特征。从短期来看,解决个案非常重要,“一事一议”有利于单个信访问题的快速解决,可以缓解信访人个人的问题,尤其是在解决政治问题个案上具有明显的优势。但是,随着拨乱反正的完成,信访开始从政治类诉求转向经济利益诉求。对于经济诉求,“一事一议”的个案解决模式容易不断地突破法律和政策的原则性规定,对法制和政策系统的统一性形成侵蚀,不符合依法治国对法的一致性的要求,需要对此进行及时调整。 At present, the department of letters and petitions has relatively low influence on government decision-making and public policies. The focus of its work is still on the case-solving and has the typical characteristic of “one thing, one bill”. In the short term, solving a case is very important. The “one case, one motion” is conducive to the rapid settlement of a single case of petitioners and letters and can ease the individual problems of petitioners. In particular, they have obvious advantages in resolving political issues. However, with the completion of the disorderly promotion, letters and calls began to shift from political appeals to economic interests. As for the economic demands, the “one case, one case” model of case resolution can easily break through the principle provisions of laws and policies, erode the unity of the legal system and the policy system, and fail to meet the requirement of law-governing by law governing the consistency of the law. Need to be adjusted in time.