论文部分内容阅读
从嘉宝实业虚假陈述案、达尔曼虚假陈述案以及五粮液虚假陈述案等证券民事侵权纠纷典型案例可以看出,目前我国证券民事赔偿诉讼中存在的不足主要包括涉诉公司“弃卒保车”的应诉策略易被投资者滥用、诉讼周期漫长复杂且投资者借助司法救济成本较高,以及现有诉讼机制并不能实现对受害投资者的全面救济等。借鉴境外经验,可以考虑从几个机制入手完善我国的证券民事赔偿诉讼制度:一是建立多层次的替代纠纷解决机制;二是优化行政前置程序;三是设置证券专业法庭;四是引入示范诉讼机制;五是分步推进集团诉讼模式的建立。
From Jiabao Industrial misrepresentation case, Darman false statement and Wuliangye misrepresentation cases such as securities tort cases can be seen from the current civil securities litigation in China, the main shortcomings include litigation company " ’S respondent strategy is easy to be abused by investors, the litigation period is long and complex, the investors’ cost of judicial relief is high, and the existing litigation mechanism can not realize the full relief to the victim investor. Draw lessons from overseas experience, we can consider starting from several mechanisms to improve China’s civil securities litigation system: First, the establishment of multi-level alternative dispute resolution mechanism; second is to optimize the administrative procedures; third is to set up securities courts; Fourth, the introduction of demonstration Litigation mechanism; Fifth, step by step to promote the establishment of group litigation mode.