论文部分内容阅读
在解说性的传统方法仍占主导地位的当下我国宪法学界,方法多元化的现象也已次第呈现,“规范宪法学”或可视为其中一端。它不是完全突兀的个人构想,而是秉承了“规范(性)法学”的深厚传统以及有关“规范宪法”学说的理想;它主张适度地返回规范主义,但又不至于完全退到法律实证主义的立场;它以宪法解释学为核心的方法定位,但又涵盖更多的方法论上的视角和手段;它以三种的姿态力图“围绕规范形成思想”,但又不断躬身自问“围绕”什么样的“规范”这一超“法教义学”的终极问题。
At the moment when the commentary traditional method still dominates the current phenomenon of diversification of the constitutional scholars and methods in our country, the phenomenon of “diversification” of the methods has also taken the lead. The “normative constitutional law” can be regarded as one of the two ends. It is not a totally obtrusive personal conception, but a profound tradition of “normative (legal) jurisprudence” and an ideal of “regulating the constitutional doctrine”; it advocates a modest return to normative doctrine but does not completely withdraw from legal positivism It focuses on the methodology of constitutional hermeneutics but covers more methodological perspectives and approaches. It tries to “form ideas around the norm” with three kinds of gestures, What kind of “norms” this ultra “legal education” ultimate problem.