论文部分内容阅读
解缙在明初书法史上具有举足轻重的地位,其书法以婉丽端雅的小楷和纵情恣肆的狂草著称,其书论《春雨杂述》也为后世频频征引。然而清代万斯同《群书疑辨》,官修《续文献通考》、《四库全书总目》,周中孚《郑堂读书记》,以及近代余绍宋《书画书录解题》等,对《春雨杂述》的真实性却提出了不同程度的疑议。本文将对相关史料进行爬梳整理,条分缕析,探赜《春雨杂述》的辑成时间和过程,并对上述诸家提出的疑议逐一辨证,以期还其本来面目。
Xie Jin plays an important role in the history of calligraphy in the early Ming Dynasty. His calligraphy is well known for its graceful, graceful little letters and indulgent unbridled madmans. His book The Spring Quotations is frequently quoted for later generations. However, the Qing Dynasty Vance with the “group book suspected” official repair “continued literature pass”, “Sikuquanshuzongmu”, Zhou Zhongfu “Zheng Tong secretary”, as well as the modern Yu Shaosong “calligraphy and painting problem solving” , Etc., on the “Spring Rain Miscellaneous” the authenticity has put forward different degrees of doubt. This article will sort out the relevant historical materials, stratified analysis, explore the compilation time and process of the Spring Festival Miscellaneous Miscellaneous, and the suspicions of the above-mentioned one by one dialectical, with a view to its true features.