论文部分内容阅读
本文以世所公认的唐摹书法精品为研究对象,分析了现存临、摹、拓本以及阁帖的成因及优劣,指出古今关于“摹”的概念已经产生了质的区别。进一步确定明清以后无论公私庋藏流传的,以为是王羲之亲笔之作的无一不是复制品。因此,“书圣”王羲之的书法面貌与唐摹本有着特别的依存关系。同时,在考定古代法书摹本特定历史价值和艺术价值的基础上,分析现存王羲之书法研究材料的真实可靠性。
This article takes the worldly acknowledged Tang calligraphic works as the research object, analyzes the causes and pros and cons of the extant, the tracing, the extrication and the extant prose. It points out that the conception of “G ” has produced the qualitative difference between ancient and modern times. To further determine whether after the Ming and Qing dynasties regardless of the spread of public and private, that is, Wang Xizhi’s autograph is both a replica. Therefore, “book St. ” Wang Xizhi’s calligraphy and Tang copy has a special dependency relationship. At the same time, on the basis of examining the specific historical value and artistic value of ancient legal copy, this paper analyzes the authenticity of the existing research materials of Wang Xizhi’s calligraphy.