论文部分内容阅读
敦煌寫本P.2861.2+P.2256所載的一份古靈寶經目録對六朝道教史研究具有重要意義,大淵忍爾等學者對此卷的研究作出了很大貢獻,但也遺留一些基本而關鍵的問題没有解決。本文就以往學者未能解決的元始舊經“已出”和“未出”卷比例從21∶15變成22∶14的情況展開討論,認爲這一卷之差是指“智慧上品大戒三卷”中後出的一卷本《大戒經》。這不僅可以在敦煌原卷中找到内證,還可通過比較一卷本的《大戒經》與先出的二卷本《罪根品》的戒律思想得到進一步印證。
Dunhuang Manuscript P.2861.2 + P.2256 contained in a directory of the Ancient Lingbao Taoist history of the six dynasties research is of great significance, Uemura and other scholars contributed to the study of this volume, but also left some basic The key problem is not solved. This article discusses the situation that the old scholars can not solve the problem of changing the ratio of “old” to “not yet” from 21:15 to “22:14” Wisdom top grade three volumes “in the post-a volume of” The Book of Changes. “ This can not only find the internal evidence in the original Dunhuang Manuscripts, but also can be further confirmed by comparing the precepts of the ”Great Roots Scriptures“ and the first two volumes of ”Singers".