论文部分内容阅读
文化宪法作为对宪法上文化条款做体系化解释的重要路径日益受到重视,但在如何处理“国家与文化之关系”这一问题上,理论界存有不同意见。“国家与文化之关系”的类型学说作为一组分析工具可以有一定的功用,但不可对其附加宪法规范的属性,尤其在处理经历过巨大变迁的八二宪法时,这一分析工具更不宜成为文化宪法之理论建构的先入之见,应当回归到以宪法第47条之文化权条款为中心的路径,寻求一套有关文化宪法的融贯论述。
As an important way to systematize the cultural articles of the Constitution, the cultural constitution has drawn more and more attention. However, the theoretical circles hold different opinions on how to deal with the issue of the relationship between the state and the culture. The type theory of “the relationship between state and culture” can serve as a set of analytical tools but can not attach constitutional norms to it. Especially when dealing with the August 2 constitution that has undergone tremendous changes, this type of analysis tool Should not be the preconceived idea of the theoretical construction of cultural constitution, it should return to the path of cultural rights clause of Article 47 of the Constitution as the center and seek a coherent discourse on the cultural constitution.