元末朱元璋部红军中发生的邵荣叛乱事件(1362),历来为官私记载避忌。由常见《明太祖实录》和新近刊布俞本《纪事录》可证,邵荣在叛乱前长期为江南红军中地位仅次于朱元璋、远迈等其他将领的重要人物。用《至正金陵新志》对照《实录》、《纪事录》可证,红军渡江后两攻集庆失败、主将殒命是朱元璋与元朝降将合谋铲除上司的结果,而叛乱的邵荣等继承了原红军主将的残余势力,对朱元璋的地位构成了威胁。再对照《实录》纂修官刘辰《国初事迹》,可证是朱元璋在红军遭受重创之时,不惜后果谋划激发叛乱,销泯了来自内部的挑战。铲除红军上司、诛杀郭氏后人、诱发邵荣叛乱,可谓洪武时期朱元璋屠戮功臣、以效率换秩序“国策”的先声和渊源。 Shao Rong rebellion (1362) occurred in the Red Army of the Yuan Dynasty Zhu Yuanzhang, has always been a taboo to record official and private records. From the common “Ming Taizu real record” and the newly published Yu Ben “Chronicle” can be evidence, Shao Rong long before the rebellion Jiangnan Red Army ranks second behind the Zhu Yuanzhang, far and other important generals. With “Zhijin Jinling New Records” control “Record”, “Chronicle” can be certified, the Red Army crossed the river after the attack two sets of Qing failure, the Lord is a mortal is the Yuan Dynasty and the fall of conspiracy to eradicate the boss results, while Shao Rong insurgency Inherited the remnants of the original Red Army chief, posed a threat to the status of the emperor. Compare with the “Record” compilation officer Liu Chen’s “Story of Early China”, which proves that at the time when the Red Army was hit hard, the emperor challenged the insurgency at a pains of consequences and sold internally the challenge. Eradicating the boss of the Red Army and killing Guo’s descendants and inducing the Shao Rong rebellion can be described as the preconception and origin of Zhu Yuanzhang’s sacrificial hero in the Hongwu period and its change of efficiency order.