近日,接连读过几篇加署本报评论员的破“三铁”文章,引用的事例均系前几年的“老年历”。一则消息称;某厂1986年第一次破“三铁”,有8名中层干部未被聘用。接着1988年第二次破“铁交椅”,原4名副厂长中有1人被解聘降职使用,原104名中层干部受聘的只有85人。诸如此类破“三铁”文章,乍看标题倒也蛮唬人的,但细一琢磨,不禁疑窦顿生:其一,报道内 Recently, I read a few Articles of the “three railway” that read and editorialized this newspaper’s commentators in succession. The cited examples refer to the “almanac” of previous years. A source said: A factory in 1986 for the first time to break “three railways”, eight middle-level cadres have not been hired. Then, in 1988, for the second time, “Tiejiao Chair” was broken. One of the four former deputy directors was demobilized and demoted. The original 104 middle-level cadres were only employed by 85 people. Such as breaking the “three railway” article, at first glance, the title is pretty bluffing, but a detailed study, can not help but doubts: one, reported