物权法问世之际即遭到“钉子户”的挑战。基于土地征收衍生的纠纷并没有因物权法的降临而减少。从法理上看,只依靠现有任何一部法律都难以承受公共利益界定之重。因此,我们能做的,就是重新审视公共利益的界定,揭开“钉子户”现象的谜底。 The advent of property law that was “ nails ” challenge. Disputes based on land acquisition have not been reduced by the advent of the Property Law. From a legal point of view, it is hard to bear the weight of public interest only by relying on any existing law. Therefore, what we can do is to reexamine the definition of public interests and reveal the answer to the phenomenon of “nail households”.