论文部分内容阅读
近日,大兴区长子营镇党委组织了一次对村级领导班子和干部的调查,对全镇42个村6673个农户全部入户发问卷,对本村领导班子和干部究竟满意不满意进行无记名填写,结果群众对村级领导班子和干部的满意率达到96%。这么高的满意率是怎么来的?镇党委对近年来的工作进行了认真分析,认为是一管、二干、三带赢得了群众的信任。一管。2001年3月,郑二营村5名群众到镇里反映村干部招待费一年1.2万元,全村300口人,人均负担40元。群众说,土地承包费交给这样的村干部我们不放心。镇党委马上责成镇经管站调查。经查,问题基本属实。镇党委做出决定:不合理的费用不给报销,把主要村干部调整下来。通过这件事,镇党委意识到:问题出在对村干部的监管不力上。搞市场经济,村干
Recently, the Party Committee of Changziying Town in Daxing District organized a survey of village-level leading bodies and cadres to conduct questionnaire surveys on 6673 households in 42 villages in the whole town and fill up the questionnaire with unsatisfied opinions about whether the leading groups and cadres in the village are satisfied or not. Results The satisfaction rate of the masses to village-level leading bodies and cadres reached 96%. How did such a high satisfaction rate come from? The town party committee conducted a careful analysis of its work in recent years and considered it as one of the first, second and third bands to win the trust of the masses. One tube. March 2001, Zheng Erying 5 villagers to the town to reflect the village cadres Hospitality 12,000 yuan a year, the village of 300 people, the per capita burden of 40 yuan. The masses said that we do not trust land contract fees to be paid to such village cadres. Town party committee immediately instructed the town management station investigation. After investigation, the basic problem is true. The town Party committee decided: unreasonable expenses do not give reimbursement, the main village cadres adjusted. Through this incident, the town party committee realized that the problem lies in the ineffective supervision over the village cadres. Engage in market economy, village cadres