论文部分内容阅读
以山东半岛为依托对深水简化的波浪能评估方法和Kim简化的评估方法进行对比研究。首先,运用波浪模型SWAN对山东半岛16 a的波候进行模拟,并与观测值进行比较,结果拟合良好;其次,运用这两种评估方法对山东半岛波浪资源能进行计算,并与SWAN模型计算的精确解进行比较;最后,选取两个断面和断面上的10个不同水深点进行研究。研究结果表明:两种简化方法计算结果均比精确解大,随着水深的增加,差距逐渐加大,但与精确解的相关性也逐渐变大,整体而言,深水简化方法要优于Kim简化方法。
Based on the Shandong Peninsula, a simplified wave assessment method and a simplified Kim assessment method were compared. First of all, using the wave model SWAN to simulate the 16-year climate in Shandong Peninsula and comparing with the observation data, the results are well fitted. Secondly, the wave resources of the Shandong Peninsula are calculated by these two assessment methods and compared with SWAN model Computational exact solutions are compared. Finally, 10 different water depths on two sections and sections are selected. The results show that the calculated results of both simplified methods are larger than the exact solutions, and the gap increases with the increase of water depth, but the correlation with the exact solution becomes larger. On the whole, the simplified method is better than Kim Simplify the method.