论文部分内容阅读
对于违反《证券法》第86条权益公开规则及慢走规则,继续买卖股票的行为,司法实践多集中于对违反权益公开规则法律适用的讨论,而并未触及对慢走规则下大额持股变动的法律性质及规则适用的裁判。从证券监管机构已做出的行政处罚决定书来看,对于这一问题也语焉不详。针对这一争议问题,跳出固有的思维模式,而从公司法、合同法、刑法、证券法等多研究视角,对慢走规则下大额持股变动的法律性质、后果及规则适用等问题进行探讨,更能以不同角度之分析,厘清该问题的本质。
In the case of violation of the open rules and slow walking rules of Article 86 of the Securities Law and the continued buying and selling of stocks, the judicial practice has focused more on the discussion of the law applicable to the violation of the rules on the disclosure of rights and interests, The legal nature of changes in shares and the rules applicable to the referee. Judging from the decision on administrative sanctions that securities regulators have already made, it is not clear about this issue. Against this controversial issue, we jump out of the inherent mode of thinking. From the perspectives of corporate law, contract law, criminal law, securities law and other research perspectives, we study the legal nature of the large-sum shareholding changes and the application of the rules under the law of slow walking Explore, better from different angles of analysis, to clarify the essence of the problem.