庄子在《逍遥游》中说,他以为的“逍遥”即是“无所待”,因而引起众人反驳,说这是“唯心主义的诡辩”,因而对他的观点予以消极评价。我初读《逍遥游》,对庄周老先生的“无所待”并不认同。比如说,庄先生先言万物皆有所待,都需要条件才能生存。到后来却说,自己追求无所待。怎么? Zhuangzi said in his “Amateur” that what he thought of as “freedom” was “nothing to do” and it caused everyone to refute this, saying that it was “a sophistry of idealism” and therefore gave a negative evaluation of his views. When I first read “A Leisurely Tour”, I did not agree with Mr. Zhuang Zhou’s “nothing to do”. For example, Mr. Zhuang said that all things are to be done and everything needs conditions to survive. Later, he said that he pursued nothing. how?