论文部分内容阅读
陳寅恪關於李唐皇室先祖世居趙郡,以及家世書寫中攀附西涼皇帝李暠並以隴西爲郡望的假說,儘管遭到衆多質疑,迄今仍然是最符合歷史實際和唐朝官方叙事邏輯的分析。在以墓誌爲主體的李唐皇室家世書寫中,呈現出强調郡望與淡化祖籍的現象,正凸顯了陳寅恪所論其虛構郡望的內在邏輯。李唐皇室虛構隴西郡望的同時又在趙郡營建祖陵,在官方書寫中編造祖先的仕歷以自圓其說,以服務於其樹立新門閥的政治意圖,結果卻衝擊了門閥士族的社會根基,推動了士族社會的瓦解。
Chen Yin-ke’s theory about the ancestral home of Zhao Tang in the Tang dynasty, Zhao Jun, and the hypothesis that Xi Liang emperor Li Hao climbed up and Longxi was appointed as a writer in his family writings still hitherto most questioned the historical logic and official logic of the Tang Dynasty analysis. In the imperial family written in the Tang Dynasty with the epitaph as the main body, the phenomenon of emphasizing the county and desalinating the ancestral home has been shown, which highlights the internal logic of Chen Yinque’s fictitious countyhood. Li Tang imperial family fiction Longxi County look at the same time in Zhaojun camp to build the ancestral calendar, in the official writing of the ancestors of the official calendar to justify, to serve the political intentions of establishing a new gatekeeper, the result has hit the door of the family of social groups, Promoted the disintegration of the family society.