论文部分内容阅读
目的对比口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损中的治疗效果。方法选取牙列缺损患者80例随机分成对照组和观察组,对照组患者给予常规修复治疗,观察组患者给予口腔种植修复治疗,对比两组患者的总有效率、患者自觉满意度等指标值。结果观察组患者的治疗总有效率97.5%高于对照组(82.5%),且患者在咀嚼功能、语言功能、固位功能、美观功能的自觉满意度评分均比对照组高(P<0.05)。结论口腔种植修复治疗牙列缺损安全可行,利于患者牙齿咀嚼功能的恢复,改善美观度,提高患者的生活质量,值得推广。
Objective To compare the effects of dental implants and routine repair on dentition defect. Methods Totally 80 cases of dentition defect were randomly divided into control group and observation group. Patients in control group were given routine repair treatment. Patients in observation group were given oral implant repair treatment. The total effective rate and voluntary satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of observation group was 97.5% higher than that of the control group (82.5%), and patients’ self-satisfaction scores of chewing function, language function, retention function and aesthetic function were higher than those of the control group (P0.05) . Conclusion Dental implant restoration is safe and feasible for the treatment of dentition defects, which is beneficial to the restoration of chewing function, improvement of aesthetics and the quality of life of patients. It deserves promotion.